Learn about the best GoPro video editors for Windows and Mac (and Linux). In this post, you'll learn about your options for great GoPro editing software. I'll cover both free and premium programs - for both Windows and Mac. The list includes the best options for editing your GoPro video - according to user ratings and sales volume. ![]() Exclusive Bonus: my free cheatsheet (with examples) of tried and tested ways to cover a scene or action that will save your skin when your mind goes blank (PDF file optimized for mobiles and tablets). Apple has always led the way when it came to computer design, at least as far back as I can remember. Where Apple always lagged behind (a matter of opinion and not always fact) is in raw computing power. Other manufacturers must surely be scratching their heads over this one question: How come Apple can create so much excitement and passion over its products, by continuously reinventing and redesigning them, so that their customers (and non-customers) are willing to pay a premium for the privilege of using them? This article is a summary of my thoughts on the new Mac Pro. Artlandia symmetryworks serial mac app. I am going to try to answer the following questions: • Why is the Mac Pro designed as it is, and how does it help video editors and post production professionals? • Why should you get excited (or not)? • Does the new Mac Pro deliver on its video editing promises? • Is the new Mac Pro expensive, or can you build a PC for cheaper? • Which model should you buy for best bang for your buck? What is the new Apple Mac Pro? In many ways, the new Apple Mac Pro is simply an iteration of the old Mac Pro. It is a workstation-class computer designed for heavy lifting. In our industry, it means faster: • Video Editing • Photography Processing • Motion Graphics • Compositing and other VFX • 3D Animations Before we go on, it must be understood that a workstation has many other use scenarios, like in the fields of medicine, architecture, business, data centers, and so on. The Mac Pro is not only for video. If I had to sum up Apple’s brief in creating this Mac Pro, I’d say it was somewhat along the lines of: It has to be half as big, but twice as good in every respect. Does it deliver? Here’s my answer, if you don’t want to read the rest of his article: Yes, it does. I believe it is a must-buy – if – you’re in the market for a new workstation-class computer, your favorite applications run on OS X, and you can afford the price of entry. There is no better deal out there, period. Sareesh Sudhakaran antoinegrasset quote: ———- GTX, though excellent, are not workstation class. They perform better, but workstations are primarily about reliability, service and low power consumption; specifically built for a certain task, not raw power. ———– You seem to contradict yourself. You say that they perform better, that workstations perform worse. So why spend that much money? Service and reliability? They are exactly the same quality and if it breaks, you get it fixed through warranty, no problem. You might not be aware what the firepro and quattro series are made for: mostly for CAD and such programs, not video editing and graphics design. They often are required by the very specific programs like AutoCAD. They are also wildly overpriced, because they are often sold to companies, that have no choice but to buy them because only they have the certified drivers. The GTX series is as powerful, if not more (you can see that by the gigantic heat sink), but lack the drivers for these specific programs, hence forcing the buyers to buy the massively overpriced workstation series. Raw power by the way is the thing that gets your video rendered faster, so raw power is very important, it is actually the only thing that matters. What you are saying is like pretending that a car that has half as much horse power is the better race car because it uses less fuel It will still lose every race to the faster more powerful one. I doubt very much that any very powerful system on the planet is energy efficient: There are no graphics cards on the market that give you magically more power for less energy usage, just does not exist. You will also notice that no graphics card in the last 20 years ever had a smaller heat sink and less power consumption than a predecessor. ![]() This is because the companies are not stupid, they don’t put such large heat sinks on these puppies just for fun, they are actually needed and if you run a very powerful GPU for number crunching (I use it for Raytracing CGI with Blender 3d, via CUDA), it will get hot and drink a lot of power and create a lot of heat, that can never be avoided. BUT, thanks to CUDA it also finishes the animation or still picture 5 times faster than even the fastest CPU I have seen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |